4/10
Curmudgeon Writer's Relentless Cynicism And Anti-Commercial Stance Hinder Audience Connection
21 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The introduction of Thelonious "Monk" Ellison, played by Jeffrey Wright, in American Fiction is initially promising. Here we have a non-woke African American novelist and professor who challenges black victimhood and upholds academic standards. Despite receiving praise in academic circles, his latest manuscript fails to gain commercial traction due to not being "black enough" for the mainstream public, especially a predominantly white liberal audience.

Monk is forced to take an unpaid sabbatical from his job as a professor at a Los Angeles university after making what are deemed racially insensitive remarks to offended students. This sets the stage for his journey to Boston, where his family lives. At a poorly attended seminar about his latest work, Monk is irked to see fellow academic Sintara Golden celebrated for her bestselling novel "We's Lives in Da Ghetto," which he views as a collection of black stereotypes.

In response, Monk writes a satirical novel titled 'My Pafology' (later renamed with a four-letter expletive), mocking literary stereotypes of the black community such as gang warfare, drug use, and absent fathers.

In the source material, the film is based on-the 2001 novel Erasure by Percival Everett-the satire is developed as a faux novel as described in Everett's work. However, writer/director Chod Jefferson's adaptation falls short, offering only an unfunny live-action fantasy reenactment of a gang member confrontation in front of Monk as he pens his mocking diatribe. This missed opportunity leaves us without a clear depiction of the stereotypes that Monk vehemently objects to, diluting the impact of his satire.

Despite his principles, Monk's satire becomes a national bestseller. He initially resists selling the rights but eventually gives in due to financial needs, particularly to care for his mother who has Alzheimer's.

The film misses another opportunity to highlight the nature of Monk's objections when the novel's film rights are sold. Instead of delving into this aspect, we are presented with a pretentious director who briefly outlines his plans for the film adaptation to an unenthusiastic Monk. The potential for a "film within a film" scenario, which could have added humor and depth, is lost in this portrayal.

As Monk reluctantly agrees to judge a literary award as part of a "diversity push," he finds common ground with Sintara, his fellow judge and former adversary. While the white critics on the panel appear to receive short shrift here and hence can be viewed as stereotypes, the view of Sintara is more nuanced.

The film's strongest scene emerges during a candid discussion between Monk and Sintara after he wins the literary prize. Sintara defends her novel, arguing that she's catering to market demands rather than perpetuating stereotypes deliberately. This confrontation adds depth to their characters and the underlying themes.

However, much of the film devolves into a family melodrama, focusing on Monk's strained relationship with his gay brother and the challenges of caring for his mother. A subplot involving his romance with the neighbor who lives across the street Coraline lacks depth and fizzles out without significant impact on the narrative.

Jeffrey Wright's portrayal of Monk, while proficient, struggles to humanize a character whose relentless cynicism and anti-commercial stance hinder audience connection. The film's conclusion, suggesting Monk's story as a fictional creation, feels like a cop-out. The narrative's final twist, where Monk embraces literary exploitation he once condemned, presents a conflicting message about his character's integrity.

In conclusion, "American Fiction" attempts to tackle complex themes but falls short in execution, leaving viewers with a mixed bag of intriguing ideas and missed opportunities for deeper exploration.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed