IMDb RATING
5.4/10
6.9K
YOUR RATING
An order of Druids train their children to battle an evil Warlock determined to unleash Satan upon the world by bringing a collection of five mystic rune stones together.An order of Druids train their children to battle an evil Warlock determined to unleash Satan upon the world by bringing a collection of five mystic rune stones together.An order of Druids train their children to battle an evil Warlock determined to unleash Satan upon the world by bringing a collection of five mystic rune stones together.
- Awards
- 2 nominations
Wren T. Brown
- Assistant
- (as Wren Brown)
Gary Carlos Cervantes
- Cabbie
- (as Gary Cervantes)
Mihaly 'Michu' Meszaros
- Augusto
- (as Michu Meszaros)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaFrank LaLoggia was originally slated to direct this movie, but he was let go by the studio when his vision of the film proved to be too expensive.
- GoofsWhen Warlock is pushing a rock onto Sam, you can see crew behind the rock along with cameraman.
- Alternate versionsThe region 2 DVD has an extended version of the Warlock leaving the elevator after Ted's death.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Making of 'Warlock: The Armageddon' (1993)
- SoundtracksWHAT CAN YOU DO FOR ME (SALT LAKE MIX)
Performed by Utah Saints (as The Utah Saints)
Written by J. Willis and G. Guthrie
Published by NTV Music (UK) Ltd. / Tiju Music, Inc. /
PRI Music, Inc.
Courtesy of London Records
By Arrangement with Polygram Special Markets
Featured review
An equally good sequel
First off, let me say that you can watch "Warlock: The Armageddon" without having seen the first "Warlock" movie. Of course you will have more depth to the warlock character, if you have seen it, but you will not miss out on anything if you haven't.
This sequel is as good as the first movie in the series.
Again, the role of the sinister warlock is portrayed by the charismatic Julian Sands. And in this movie the character is much more dark and evil, far more twisted than the warlock portrayed in the first movie. Julian Sands is so perfect for the role of the warlock.
The cast is good, and the roles of the druids are good, both for the young druids and the elderly druids.
The movie has a bunch of cool effects and wicked magics, something that have to be seen. However, it is not all good though, the scene with the knife went horribly wrong. That knife is perhaps the worst CGI effect I have seen to date.
For fans of adventure genres or for people who like to play D&D games, this movie provides good entertainment. And like the first "Warlock" movie, this also have enough entertainment for more than one watching. I never grow tired of it, at least!
This sequel is as good as the first movie in the series.
Again, the role of the sinister warlock is portrayed by the charismatic Julian Sands. And in this movie the character is much more dark and evil, far more twisted than the warlock portrayed in the first movie. Julian Sands is so perfect for the role of the warlock.
The cast is good, and the roles of the druids are good, both for the young druids and the elderly druids.
The movie has a bunch of cool effects and wicked magics, something that have to be seen. However, it is not all good though, the scene with the knife went horribly wrong. That knife is perhaps the worst CGI effect I have seen to date.
For fans of adventure genres or for people who like to play D&D games, this movie provides good entertainment. And like the first "Warlock" movie, this also have enough entertainment for more than one watching. I never grow tired of it, at least!
helpful•197
- paul_haakonsen
- Feb 15, 2010
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $3,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $3,902,679
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $1,747,317
- Sep 26, 1993
- Gross worldwide
- $3,902,679
- Runtime1 hour 38 minutes
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content