Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Pocahontas (I) (1995)
8/10
After a nine-year absence...
20 November 2007
... of watching this movie, I literally forgot everything about it.. except for "Colors of the Wind." So I was able to view it quite objectively.

Okay, let's get one thing straight: this film is BY NO MEANS HISTORICALLY ACCURATE! Pocahontas wasn't a young woman when John Smith met her, but rather a young girl; she never fell in love with Captain Smith (there are some scholars who speculate on whether or not he actually tried to *rape* her); Pocahontas wasn't her real name, but a Hebrew nickname meaning "playful one," given to her by the English (her real name was Matoaka); and I could go on and on about the history they got wrong in this movie. I suppose that, if I were an American Indian, perhaps I would be offended by this portrayal of Pocahontas, but since I'm a Euro-American with a very small part of American Indian (my great-great grandfather was a Blackfoot, adopted by an Irish family; and my great-great--uh, great?--grandmother was a Cherokee who walked the trail of tears), I can view this movie with less of a bias.

The reason that I hadn't seen this movie in nine years was because, back when I was a little kid (I'm sixteen now), I cried. I was so used to Disney 'happy-endings' that I was saddened by the outcome of Pocahontas. And I refused to watch it ever again, so my mom sold it at the next garage sale. But after watching it now, I can appreciate how Pocahontas isn't Cinderella: she doesn't have a spare glass slipper so she can marry the prince; she's not Sleeping Beauty, who can just be kissed by her true love while she rests in ageless sleep; and she's not The Little Mermaid, whose fins are miraculously turned into human legs by her father so she can marry a human prince. Pocahontas and John SMith came from two very different worlds, ones that would fight for hundreds of years over the ownership of the "New World." I am glad, actually, that the ending isn't stereotypical Disney, but rather bittersweet and unforgettable. I love the fact that this is a Disney movie for emotionally mature audiences. I don't recommend it for children under thirteen.

The music in this movie is amazing. "Colors of the Wind" won the Oscar, but I honestly think "Just Around the Riverbend" and "If I Never Knew You" are better! It's not just the wonderful melodies that add to the magic of Pocahontas, but also the deep, dark lyrics.

I give this 8/10. Unfairly underrated.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Quite possibly the best teenage movie to date. (spoilers throughout)
22 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
"Saturday, March 24, 1884. Shermer High School. Shermer, Illinois, 60062."

Most people would give an exasperated sigh at that monotonous voice-over, but not in this case, since preceding it was a David Bowie lyric from "Changes" on a black screen smashed like a glass window, the pieces falling to reveal Shermer High. Such an opening visual wakes up the audience to the sleepy town of Shermer, Illinois--sleepy like the monotone of the voice-over.

What you get from the voice-over is that five people have detention from 7:00 a.m. to dinnertime (I believe it's 6:00 p.m.), and each person is a typical high school teenage stereotype: the brain, the athlete, the basket case, the princess, and the criminal. Following the voice-over, you witness each student arrive at school.

The princess skipped class to go shopping, but her father clearly spoils her and doesn't seem to care much about her offense. Because we know so early what Claire (the princess) did to get the detention, we assume that her character is easy to read. But after a while, you find out that her parents use her for leverage in a crumbling and loveless marriage; that she's no promiscuous "little-miss-popular," but rather a naive virgin; and she actually hates being the popular person she is, and hates her material world and the pressures in it.

The athlete's father seems to be genuinely concerned about his son. He says that guys "screw around" and that's customary, except this time Andy (the jock) got caught, and he has to suffer the consequences now. His father tells him to basically get his act together, because no school will give scholarships to discipline cases--which is true, and he's right. But throughout the movie it's revealed that Andy has no desire to be a varsity wrestler; he only does it because it makes his father proud. And then you find out that the reason Andy is in detention is because he beat up a much weaker kid in the locker room. Why? Because his father dislikes weakness, and Andy wanted to please his father. Once Andy's heartbreaking story is told, you look back on the conversation between Andy and his father in the truck and realize what a douche-bag his father really is.

The brain's case is possibly the most surprising of all of them. Brian (brain, with the "a" and the "i" reversed) is a straight-A student who seems to be picked on a lot by people like Claire, Andy, and the criminal. He always tries to fit in, and you wonder what got such a nice kid in detention in the first place? A gun in his locker, because he failed wood-shop (a class he thought would be easy and give him a chance to mingle with more "average" and popular kids) and ruined his 4.0 GPA. It's not really his family that pressures him so much (although you can see in the beginning that his mother isn't happy with him AT ALL), but rather himself, because school smarts are the only smarts that people like him really know, and they are afraid to fail at the one thing they are good at. (Take it from someone who was almost exactly like him in junior high--minus the gun.) Although the gun was only a flare, it showed everyone else at detention that Brian needed to break out of his shell and become their friend.

The criminal, John Bender (they just call him Bender), doesn't come to school with a parent, he walks. When he gets inside the library (where the detention is held), he takes the phone off the hook and does a couple of other kooky things. He seems to take pride in being able to annoy people, especially Claire and Principal Vernon, the guy who basically represents the rest of Society to the five students. He pulled a false fire alarm to get into detention, and he earns another eight during this detention. But he's not really heartless, despite several arguments where he practically crucifies Claire (his crush). During the course of the movie, you find that his father is physically abusive (proven by the cigar burn on his arm), and he has just as many feelings as any other kid at school, though his are well-hidden.

The last student is the basket case, Allison. She didn't do anything to earn the detention, but lied to her parents because she actually had nothing better to do on a Saturday. When she gets out of the car in the beginning (the back seat, actually), she tries to talk to her mother, but her mother rolls up the window and drives off. Apparently, she is always ignored at home, and she reaches out to the unsuspecting students at detention, actually finding out most of their stories through careful insight before they admit anything (especially Andy).

So, what happened on Monday? This is a popular question for Breakfast Club fans. Do Andy and Allison stay together? What about Bender and Claire? When Brian walks up to one of them, will they shun him (as usual) or accept him? Will Andy apologize to Larry Lester for beating him up? Will all of the students resolve their problems with the parental units? And finally, will Principal Vernon find a way to actually reach out to students in need instead of always putting them down? The fact that the Breakfast Club is open-ended, and the way it makes the viewers' imaginations take off, is one of the many things that make it a perfect 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Timeline (2003)
8/10
Surprisingly Well-Done
12 February 2007
One day, summer vacation of last year, I had nothing to do and was flipping channels on the TV. All of a sudden, I see Sci-Fi is playing "Timeline", and I remember wanting to see it after I had seen theatrical trailers all the way back in 2003! I saw the Dish Network critique is only 2 stars, but I decided to watch it anyway. And I'm so glad I did.

This movie was very well done. I'm not saying it's Godfather quality or anything--in fact, Timeline is the polar opposite. There aren't moments set aside for drama or classic acting, the script isn't necessarily 'quote-worthy', but that's what makes it so great. The characters are portrayed as real people put in an unrealistic situation: while Steven Kramer is explaining the invention of the 3-D fax that opened up a wormhole, you can hear chatter in the background between confused characters. The way the characters talk to one another is the same way you would talk to a friend... or an enemy; no hammed-up drama, they simply incorporated reality into the acting and writing of this feature.

Also, in most action movies, killing someone is a fairly simple task. If the hero has to shoot a bad guy, he/she does so, and doesn't think about it again. Here, when the archaeologists that go back in time are forced to kill as their last option (never arbitrarily), you see their reactions: the reactions of normal people who have just taken another person's life.

So I would ask all that are weary of seeing this movie: set your inhibitions and prejudices aside, and you will thoroughly enjoy this wonderful way to spend a Sunday afternoon, just as I did on that summer day last year.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Crucible (1996)
8/10
I am not someone to randomly give out a perfect score for a movie...
22 September 2006
...And I also happen to be a very critical person of most films. With that being said, The Crucible completely blows me away with its virtually flawless cinematic achievements!

Daniel Day-Lewis is absolutely superb as John Proctor; there is no other way to put it. He is simply perfect, from his bitter, withdrawn opening few lines to when he is accused of witchcraft by his former adulterous--and scorned--lover (Winona Ryder) and begins passionately fighting for his very life and existence--and, of course, his name.

Winona Ryder turns in a beautiful performance as the disturbed and tragic Abigail Williams: a Puritain orphan raised by her super-strict, brutal, and overall villainous uncle. She becomes infatuated with John Proctor, a married man and a bit of an outcast to their society, and is willing to do anything and everything to 'obtain' him, if you will.

Joan Allen's Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actress was not undeserved. Her portrayal of the honest and saintly Elizabeth Proctor (not fake innocence, like Abigail's) was touching and a bit heart-wrenching toward the end (won't give that away here).

It wasn't just the awesome acting that won me over, but the authentic Old English dialog, the somewhat grainy cinematography (which provided an uneasy feeling in viewing the town of Salem), and wonderful sets and costumes that really made this a classic for me, and my all-time favorite movie. Highly recommend it! A perfect 10/10!
82 out of 96 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty good, but it has its flaws.
7 September 2006
Okay, let's start with the story. Jack Sparrow (sorry, *Captain*) has been captain of the Black Pearl for thirteen years (unlucky thirteen, as it were). Originally, he had made a deal with the sea himself, Davy Jones, to raise the ship from the depths of his locker (we don't find out the details of that, yet, but I'm sure they'll be answered in the third movie). The deal was that Jack would be captain for thirteen years only, and then be doomed to servitude on the Flying Dutchman (Davy Jones' ship). Now, his time is up, and Jack gets the ever-familiar 'black spot' on his hand, marking him as pray for the Kraken (Davy Jones' assassination minion of the depths of the sea) if he should defy his deal.

Now for everybody else: Will and Elizabeth are about to get married in the very beginning, but a certain Lord Cutler Beckett of the East India Trading Company has put out arrest warrants for them both (for helping Jack escape the hangman's noose, for which their crime shares the exact same punishment), and one for Jack (for his crimes mentioned in the first movie), and even one for the *former* Commodore James Norrington (his conditions are a bit more fuzzy)! The deal Lord Beckett makes with Will is that, if he gets a certain 'compass' from Captain Jack, then Will and Elizabeth will both be pardoned (Norrington has been nowhere to be found for the past few weeks). Too bad Lord Beckett has a hidden agenda...

Now, that's the beginning, and I'm going to stop there, because I don't want to post any spoilers. So, with this in mind, forgive me for being a bit evasive as I give my analysis: Captain Jack changes quite a bit in this movie. He's much less decisive about what he needs to do with his strategies (and a bit sloppy with them), and his heart seems to always be torn in two (you'll see what I'm talking about during the course of the movie). Overall I see this as a negative impact for the movie, but it may turn positive in the third, showing that he is indeed 'growing'.

Will is actually an improvement, in my honest opinion. He was the classically adorable, lovesick puppy in Curse of the Black Pearl, but much more of an adult in Dead Man's Chest. He seems to have lived more in this movie, and experienced a whole lot (like all of the events of the first movie). Though some may say Orlando Bloom's acting is wooden, I *completely* disagree! I think he portrayed a very 'real' (no other word to describe it) person as Will Turner, without you feeling like you're even watching an actor, but the actual person Will Turner, ups and downs both.

Elizabeth, pardon my English, is a major S-L-U-T in this movie. She mentions toward the beginning how Lord Beckett "robbed her of her wedding night" (the least ladylike thing she could possibly say in front of company). She flirts with nearly every guy she meets in this movie (Jack most certainly included, if you can believe it!), and throws herself at a couple of them (literally). Total downhill spiral from the first movie, making Elizabeth a rich and promiscuous snob (never a good combination for a movie heroine).

Norrington is a MAJOR plus! He pitches the white wig that made him look like an ice cream cone in the first movie, and becomes... well, *piratey*, if you can believe it! His personality has many different sides here, with conflicting desires (including a possible remaining love for Elizabeth?) and motivations. And also--and this is not something to criticize the movie with, but my own heterosexual female opinion--Norrington was incredibly HOT!

The new bad guy, Davy Jones, is another negative. His story is explained (such as how he became an immortal sea-like creature), but his motivations and desires are rather fuzzy. Barbossa from the first movie was a much better villain: you knew that what he was doing was evil, and that Jack needed to defeat him for the movie to be happy, but you understood *why* Barbossa did what he did in Curse of the Black Pearl--to feel like a human being again! (And, be honest, you sympathized with him a bit.) Davy Jones, on the other hand, is much colder than Barbossa (and not in a good way), much crueler, and offers you no outlet for sympathy, making the storyline more one-sided. That's not to say Bill Nighy was bad for the role (he portrayed him very well, actually), but the character himself was a downside.

All in all, with the above story and character analysis, I give this movie 6/10 stars.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed