The Beheaded Rooster (2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Timely and Enjoyable
bloggerboyffm21 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I watched the German version of the film. Although this is not a great film, I think it is quite good,especially considering the obviously small budget and the young actors involved. I was taken in by all four main actors, particularly Ioana Iacob and Alicja Bachleda. The camera loves them. The casting of the two male leads was just fine, too. David Zimmerschied was perfect as a geeky Hitlerjugend. I also cannot follow the criticism that the actors are somehow overly theatrical or that the film is devoid of emotion. Actually, it is quite an emotional film, but the great losses, both personal and cultural, are not shown directly in the film except for the symbolic picture of Felix's house going up in flames right before the end. The personal loss really only comes out as a footnote at the end, when the writer reveals the story's outcome to Gisela's lookalike. This loss is, of course, a very politically sensitive topic. German-speaking artists want to make sure not to overplay the sense of loss or wrongdoing for fear of playing into the hands of people on the extreme right and for fear of offending the peoples who suffered so heavily under the Germans during the war. That is a story for others to tell (see, e.g., I Served the King of England).

The film does jump around at the beginning in a way that may confuse viewers, and the narrative is a bit choppy in places. It would have been a good idea to flash dates or otherwise provide historical context so that we knew exactly when each scene was playing. The soft focus of the flashback was just a tad too romantic, the colors in the film, just a tad too bright. The heavy scent of nostalgia, however, probably is culturally authentic for Germans of a certain age in the former Austro-Hungarian empire. I do agree that some scenes somehow missed reaching their potential. The tension and attraction between Felix and Gisela just never seemed to reach the right temperature. Alfa, on the other hand, was really convincing and sexy as a high-strung noble lass torn between darkness and light.

What is timely about this film is that it is part of a development since the fall of communism to tell the story of the price that Germans and German-speaking minorities paid for Germany's attempt to conquer Europe. (See, e.g., Nobel Prize in Literature given to Herta Müller.) No single film is going to be able to tell the entire story. The Beheaded Rooster focuses on a very limited time and place and still has to leave out lots of details. I wonder how historically accurate it is. Did the Jews in fascist Romania not have to wear gold stars? How far were the Nuremberg Laws implemented? Were there no mass deportations, etc? Nevertheless, what is convincing about the film is the tension among different groups in the society, the fluidity of a situation in which individuals may have had more freedom of action than often is believed, in spite of the threat from above. I recognized myself in the younger characters Felix and Hans. The hunt and capture games in the woods, the blood brotherhood, the betrayal of friendships. These are universal themes. We also experience the political tensions within Felix's family. (Granted, the Nazi aunt is overplayed, but these are not all clichés.) The scene between the father and Felix at the dinner table, when Felix appears to have become a zealot, is good and dramatic. I think the relationship between Felix, his father and his brother is well-played, if understated. Also credible is the gradual realization by Felix that he was wrong about the Nazis. Maybe we should have seen more of the suffering of the oppressed minorities in fascist Romania. Maybe everything is just a touch too colorful or sweet. Who knows? This is Radu Gabrea's and Eginald Schlattner's story, and I really enjoyedit. I look forward to reading the novel.

Let's hear it for a new wave of small-budget European films and the filmmakers who have learned to tell wonderful, slow stories that we want to watch.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A timeless masterpiece
tudornserban25 February 2009
I was intrigued even from the start of the film by the appearance of the symbol itself (a beheaded rooster) that creates an atmosphere which is ominous and dark ,if Balkanic, within very light and warm images portraying the Saxon civilization from Transylvania at the beginning of WWII.

The freshness of the main cast, along with the wonderful lightness of the images and the dreamlike music, make this film of a complexity and depth that needs to be discovered and re-discovered.

I don't think it fits in any kind of trend, genre, wave, school or generation into which some people try to include it.

"The Beheaded Rooster" is simply a wonderful film.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Beautifully mediocre
Mihnea_aka_Pitbull28 March 2008
The movie's qualities are undeniable - three in number:

  • a very beautiful photography (which is natural, since Radu Gabrea was always a very visual and plastic director);


  • an extremely competent reconstitution of the retro environment, thanks to the executive producer;


  • the commendable attempt to bring to attention a dramatic, but little known, historic reality.


Unfortunately, the script is very unprofessionally written, with a linear construction and a faulty structure. Also the directing, very amateurish, fails to create one single memorable scene - all the dramatic situations being common, predictable and childish. The actors are very poorly directed, so they play theatrically, demonstratively and with grandiloquent mannerisms - which is understandable, since Radu Gabrea is one of the so-called "middle aged dinosaurs" of Romanian cinema: the '70s generation, today deeply afflicted by obsoleteness.

The saddest thing of all is that, although dealing with the traumatic events surrounding the tragedy of an ethnic minority in the dark years of World War 2, "The Beheaded Rooster" remains devoid of any emotion. Since the author is definitely a very sensitive and feeling artist, we are led to conclude that the failure is caused simply by his professional awkwardness - which is a great pity indeed.
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A failed film on a fascinating piece of history
dromasca7 June 2009
The 800 years history of the German presence in Transylvania, its convulsed history during the 20th century and the almost total extinction of the community in the second half of the last century could be the subject and background for many fascinating stories and films. Unfortunately 'Der geköpfte Hahn' almost completely fails on all plans. The film is directed by Radu Gabrea, who as a young director in Communist Romania had an amazing first film in 1969 'Prea mic pentru un razboi atit de mare' (too young for such a great war) which precluded the theme of contrast between the innocence of childhood and the horrors of war. His career could not be continued at a sustained pace under the Communist regime, he made very few films, and this is the first that I am seeing for a long while. It is however a big disappointment. The history of the years 1940 to 1944 with the complex relations between the different communities coexisting in the city of Fagaras is described in a schematic manner, the characters are more stereotypes than real life people, they fail to move or to attract sympathy, and the story telling flows painfully with characters showing up from nowhere and disappearing without trace. I hope that some these amazing pieces in the history of Romania will have a better chance on screens in the future.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
small history
Kirpianuscus27 April 2017
I do not know if it is a beautiful, great, good of bad film. it is only useful. for not ignore. for remember. for understand. and for define the past as puzzle of small groups. and, in this way, the history becomes more significant. short, the film is result of a happy meet between a special writer and a remarkable director. each giving the story of a painful episode from recent Romanian history. story of a family, about its friends and neighbors and about the clash of every day life with the politic. and the way to tell the story is more than inspired. because it is only a testimony. about choices, broken lives, fragility of certitudes, fall of a world. nothing more. and the observation about artistic or historical accuracy sins are covered by the invitation to reflection. about a time, few people and a small history who defines the great one.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Epitome of a half-baked Nazi movie
Horst_In_Translation21 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
"Der geköpfte Hahn" or "The Beheaded Rooster" is a co-production between Germany and Romania from 2007, so this movie in the German language has its 10th anniversary this year. The director ans also one of the writers is Radu Gabrea, a filmmaker from Bucharest, who died very recently actually at the age of 79. He made several films in the German language too during his long career and this one here may very well be the most known. Still fitting with his own background, the film is set in Romania and we find our how life changes for everybody when the Nazis come to the country and impose their views on the local population. Some reach out to them right away, others may need some more convincing. This film is in particular a depiction of how the younger part of the population reacts to this new situation. Anyway, sadly this is a mediocre work overall, but I guess if there are so many films dealing with the subject of WWII and the Nazis, then there is a also a great deal of mediocrity and the fact where this is set changes very little in terms of the film's quality level.

It is not a bad movie by any means, but it is a film that does not deliver anything new to the genre at all and beyond that also stays very superficial and shallow despite occasionally trying to make an impact. Unsuccessfully. The baity title (and the scene related to it) are the best example actually. Both offer really nothing apart from disgust and shock value probably although both try to make an impact certainly. I am sure if you try hard enough you can dig out a metaphor about the entire thing, but you have to dig really deep here. The performances also weren't as good for the most part. Some serious cases of overacting and none of the actors really has the talent from what I saw to elevate the forgettable material. Then again, the latter is also not helping the cast at all, so it's kinda difficult to put any blame on them. The character transformation of the central character (young Goldschmidt) felt extremely rushed and as it is such a crucial component, it hurts the entire film. Female characters were mostly underwritten or used in a way where they felt fairly stereotypical and generic unfortunately. The latter adjective is also an accurate description of the entire almost 100 minutes. For me the dragging was far more significant than the memorable moments. If there were any, that is. Not recommended.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
old picture
Vincentiu27 November 2012
pathetic but authentic. strange but necessary. confession and kind of broken fairy-story. demonstration of use for each basic ingredient. cruel, nice and bitter. adaptation of a novel. testimony about a community life. and about its fall in Transylvania - land of many ethnics.sure, maybe it is not great. almost boring and didacticist, it has a small grain of pure beauty. the image of rooster, the performance of Dorel Vișan as Mailat, the fresh air of youth, the pieces from pure joy , the portrait of grandfathers Goldschmit. its sins - pedagogic message. so, it is not a letter but a lesson. a rock with prints of a fight without end. the effect is not remarkable. the story is forced and, for few moments, fake. but, it is a good exercise to remember the image of a lost period.
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed